Chat, feeds & video APIs · compared

Amba vs GetStream

Stream (GetStream) is top-shelf chat, activity feeds, and video — production-grade APIs and UI components, at a high price floor (around $499/mo for chat at 10K MAU, plus add-ons). Amba bundles a social graph, feeds, and group chat into one backend that also has auth, push, economy, and analytics. Choose Stream when you need the deepest real-time chat/feeds/video at scale; choose Amba when in-app communication should be one module of your backend, not a separate high-floor contract.

Get an API key Read the docsupdated June 12, 2026
or let your agent install it:

Amba is the agent-native backend for mobile apps: one backend — identity, engagement, gamification, economy, social, analytics, and infrastructure — that an AI coding agent provisions and wires in about 30 seconds over a hosted MCP server. Stream (GetStream) provides scalable APIs and pre-built UI for chat (1:1, group, channels), activity feeds, and audio/video, with advanced moderation add-ons. It’s a social/comms component, not a backend: as of mid-2026, no auth for your users, app data store, economy, content, or analytics — and its production tiers start high. What is an agent-native backend?

at a glance

Amba vs GetStream, capability by capability.

capabilityAmbaGetStream
One backend (auth + data + push + economy + social)Yes — built inNo
Auth & identity (Apple, Google, anonymous, link)Yes — built inNo
Push notifications (iOS + Android, scheduled)Yes — built inpartial
Live user segments from rulesYes — built inNo
Daily content scheduling / CMSYes — built inNo
Streaks (declarative, grace, timezone)Yes — built inNo
Leaderboards, XP & weekly leaguesYes — built inNo
Virtual economy + subscriptions / IAPYes — built inNo
Social graph, feeds & group chatYes — built inYes — built in
Product analytics (events, funnels, retention)Yes — built inNo
Feature flags & remote configYes — built inNo
Agent installs the whole backend over MCPYes — built inNo
Project-isolated database by defaultYes — built inNo
Free, self-serve start — no sales callYes — built inpartial

● built-in · partial = limited / add-on · — not offered. “Agent installs the whole backend” means the MCP surface is an entire app backend, not read/write access to one product.

Which should you choose?

Choose Amba if…
  • You want chat and feeds as one module of a backend that also has auth, push, economy, and analytics.
  • You don’t want a separate ~$499+/mo comms contract layered onto your stack.
  • You want an agent to install social alongside the rest of the backend.
Choose GetStream if…
  • You need the deepest, highest-scale real-time chat, feeds, or video with rich UI components.
  • Heavy-duty moderation and proven performance at massive scale are requirements.
  • You already have a backend and want a dedicated, proven comms layer on top.

A component vs. the backend it plugs into

Stream is chat, feeds, and video — and it’s excellent at them. But you still buy a full backend (auth, data, push, economy, analytics) around it and wire Stream to your users. Amba includes a social graph, feeds, and group chat (with read receipts and realtime subscriptions) already wired to your auth, content, and analytics.

Price floor

Stream’s production chat starts around $499/mo for 10K MAU, with feeds, video, file/storage, and advanced moderation as additional cost. Amba includes social/chat/feeds in posted per-project pricing alongside seven other surfaces, which changes the math for consumer apps where messaging is one feature among many.

Depth vs. breadth

For massive-scale messaging with rich SDK UI kits and enterprise moderation, Stream is deeper. For a consumer app that needs solid in-app communication as part of one backend, Amba’s bundled social module is usually sufficient and far simpler to operate.

where GetStream wins

Where does GetStream beat Amba?

Stream beats Amba flat-out on the depth, scale, and polish of real-time chat, feeds, and video — mature SDKs, rich UI components, heavy-duty moderation, and proven performance at massive scale that a bundled social module won’t equal. If communication is the core of your product, Stream is purpose-built.

switching

Moving from GetStream to Amba

If chat/feeds are a feature rather than the product, Amba’s social module replaces Stream and folds messaging into the same backend as auth and push. If you need Stream’s scale or video, keep it and let Amba own the rest of the backend.

Pricing context: Stream: free under small thresholds, then chat production from ~$499/mo (10K MAU), feeds ~$59–$899/mo, video metered per participant-minute, plus storage/moderation add-ons. Amba: social included in Free, $20, $200 per project. Verify Stream’s current tiers.

questions

Amba vs GetStreamFAQ

Is Amba a Stream (GetStream) alternative?

For apps where chat and feeds are a feature, yes. Amba includes a social graph, activity feeds, and group chat with read receipts and realtime subscriptions, wired to auth, push, and analytics — without a separate high-floor comms contract. Stream is deeper for messaging at massive scale.

Does Amba do real-time chat and feeds?

Yes. Amba provides friends/follows, groups, an activity feed with fan-out, direct and group messaging with read receipts, and realtime subscriptions with authorization enforced at subscribe time.

How does pricing compare?

Stream’s production chat starts around $499/mo at 10K MAU plus add-ons; Amba includes social/chat/feeds in per-project pricing alongside auth, push, economy, and analytics. For consumer apps where messaging is one feature, Amba is typically cheaper.

sources

Sources for this comparison

Competitor pricing verified June 2026. Enterprise figures are third-party estimates.

start in 30 seconds

Hand the docs to your agent.
Ship by lunch.

Read the docs